Abstract
Currently, data mining based on the application of detection of important patterns that allow making decisions according to cervical cancer is a problem that affects women from the age of 24 years and older. For this purpose, the Rapid Miner Studio tool was used for data analysis according to age. To perform this analysis, the knowledge discovery in databases (KDD) methodology was used according to the stages that this methodology follows, such as data selection, data preparation, data mining and evaluation and interpretation. On the other hand, the comparison of methodologies such as the standard intersectoral process for data mining (Crips-dm), KDD and sample, explore, modify, model, evaluate (Semma) is shown, which is separated by dimensions and in each dimension both methodologies are compared. In that sense, a graph was created comparing algorithmic models such as naive Bayes, decision tree, and rule induction. It is concluded that the most outstanding result was -1.424 located in cluster 4 in the attribute result date.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
