Abstract
Today it is the norm that all relevant proteomics data that support the conclusions in scientific publications are made available in public proteomics data repositories. However, given the increase in the number of clinical proteomics studies, an important emerging topic is the management and dissemination of clinical, and thus potentially sensitive, human proteomics data. Both in the United States and in the European Union, there are legal frameworks protecting the privacy of individuals. Implementing privacy standards for publicly released research data in genomics and transcriptomics has led to processes to control who may access the data, so-called “controlled access” data. In parallel with the technological developments in the field, it is clear that the privacy risks of sharing proteomics data need to be properly assessed and managed. In our view, the proteomics community must be proactive in addressing these issues. Yet a careful balance must be kept. On the one hand, neglecting to address the potential of identifiability in human proteomics data could lead to reputational damage of the field, while on the other hand, erecting barriers to open access to clinical proteomics data will inevitably reduce reuse of proteomics data and could substantially delay critical discoveries in biomedical research. In order to balance these apparently conflicting requirements for data privacy and efficient use and reuse of research efforts through the sharing of clinical proteomics data, development efforts will be needed at different levels including bioinformatics infrastructure, policymaking, and mechanisms of oversight.
Highlights
Graphical AbstractIn Brief Availability of proteomics data in the public domain has become the norm, as it has been the case in genomics and transcriptomics for many years
Availability of proteomics data in public repositories (ProteomeXchange) has become the norm. There are growing ethical issues and legal requirements related to human clinical proteomics data. We review the current state of the art and provide our thoughts about some proteomics data types. We make concrete recommendations to address these issues, summarized in four different points
The right balance needs to be found in providing adequate protections for PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION (PII) while still allowing for the immense potential benefits of sharing clinical proteomics data
Summary
In Brief Availability of proteomics data in the public domain has become the norm, as it has been the case in genomics and transcriptomics for many years. Given the increase in the number of clinical proteomics studies, an important emerging topic is the management and dissemination of clinical, and potentially sensitive, human proteomics data Both in the United States and in the European Union, there are legal frameworks protecting the privacy of individuals. At the time of writing, the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) human HCD (Higherenergy collisional dissociation) TMT peptide spectral library, created by combining dozens of different human samples, contains spectra for 386,224 distinct peptide sequences, which account for a 29.1% proteome sequence coverage (https:// chemdata.nist.gov/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=peptidew:lib: human_hcd_tmt) In another ongoing effort, the resource MassIVE-KB covers 50% of the human proteome with spectra for >2.1 million distinct precursors [5]. This should be done for the main proteomics data types and different types of proteomics workflows and will be an essential component of future, adequately informed policyrelated decisions
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.