Abstract
<div>AbstractPurpose:<p>In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), somatic mutations (commonly missense, nonsense, and frameshift indels) in <i>RUNX1</i> are associated with a dismal clinical outcome. Inherited <i>RUNX1</i> mutations cause familial platelet disorder. As approximately 5%–10% of germline <i>RUNX1</i> mutations are large exonic deletions, we hypothesized that such exonic <i>RUNX1</i> aberrations may also be acquired during the development of AML.</p>Experimental Design:<p>Sixty patients with well-characterized AML were analyzed with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (<i>n</i> = 60), microarray (<i>n</i> = 11), and/or whole-genome sequencing (<i>n</i> = 8).</p>Results:<p>In total, 25 (42% of the cohort) <i>RUNX1</i>-aberrant patients (defined by the presence of classical mutations and/or exonic deletions) were identified. Sixteen patients (27%) carried only exonic deletions, 5 (8%) carried classical mutations, and 4 (7%) carried both exonic deletions and mutations. No significant difference was observed between patients with classical <i>RUNX1</i> mutations and <i>RUNX1</i> exonic deletions in median overall survival (OS, 53.1 vs. 38.8 months, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.63). When applying the European Leukemia Net (ELN) classification including the <i>RUNX1</i>-aberrant group, 20% of the patients initially stratified as intermediate-risk (5% of the whole cohort) were reassigned to the high-risk group, which improved the performance of ELN classification regarding OS between intermediate- and high-risk groups (18.9 vs. 9.6 months, <i>P</i> = 0.09).</p>Conclusions:<p>Somatic <i>RUNX1</i> exonic deletions constitute a novel recurrent aberration in AML. Our findings have important clinical implications regarding AML classification, risk stratification, and treatment decision. Moreover, they argue in favor of further investigating such genomic aberrations not only in <i>RUNX1</i> but also in other genes implicated in cancer biology and management.</p><p><i><a href="https://aacrjournals.org/clincancerres/article/doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1065" target="_blank">See related commentary by Chakraborty and Stengel, p. 2742</a></i></p></div>
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.