Data from Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis Identifies Senescent Osteocytes That Trigger Bone Destruction in Breast Cancer Metastasis

Abstract

<div>Abstract<p>Breast cancer bone metastases increase fracture risk and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among women. Upon colonization by tumor cells, the bone microenvironment undergoes profound reprogramming to support cancer progression, which disrupts the balance between osteoclasts and osteoblasts and leads to bone lesions. A deeper understanding of the processes mediating this reprogramming could help develop interventions for treating patients with bone metastases. Here, we demonstrated that osteocytes (Ot) in established breast cancer bone metastasis develop premature senescence and a distinctive senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) that favors bone destruction. Single-cell RNA sequencing identified Ots from mice with breast cancer bone metastasis enriched in senescence, SASP markers, and pro-osteoclastogenic genes. Multiplex <i>in situ</i> hybridization and artificial intelligence–assisted analysis depicted Ots with senescence-associated satellite distension, telomere dysfunction, and <i>p16Ink4a</i> expression in mice and patients with breast cancer bone metastasis. Breast cancer cells promoted Ot senescence and enhanced their osteoclastogenic potential in <i>in vitro</i> and <i>ex vivo</i> organ cultures. Clearance of senescent cells with senolytics suppressed bone resorption and preserved bone mass in mice with breast cancer bone metastasis. These results demonstrate that Ots undergo pathological reprogramming by breast cancer cells and identify Ot senescence as an initiating event triggering lytic bone disease in breast cancer metastases.</p><p><b>Significance:</b> Breast cancer cells remodel the bone microenvironment by promoting premature cellular senescence and SASP in osteocytes, which can be targeted with senolytics to alleviate bone loss induced by metastatic breast cancer.</p><p><a href="https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article-abstract/doi/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-24-3611" target="_blank"><i>See related commentary by Frieling and Lynch, p. 3917</i></a></p></div>