Abstract

<div>Abstract<p><b>Background:</b> Motesanib is a potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Kit receptors. In this report we examine the interaction between motesanib and radiation <i>in vitro</i> and in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) xenograft models.</p><p><b>Experimental Design:</b> <i>In vitro</i> assays were done to assess the impact of motesanib on VEGFR2 signaling pathways in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). HNSCC lines grown as tumor xenografts in athymic nude mice were utilized to assess the <i>in vivo</i> activity of motesanib alone and in combination with radiation.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Motesanib inhibited VEGF-stimulated HUVEC proliferation <i>in vitro</i>, as well as VEGFR2 kinase activity. Additionally, motesanib and fractionated radiation showed additive inhibitory effects on HUVEC proliferation. <i>In vivo</i> combination therapy with motesanib and radiation showed increased response compared with drug or radiation alone in UM-SCC1 (<i>P</i> < 0.002) and SCC-1483 xenografts (<i>P</i> = 0.001); however, the combination was not significantly more efficacious than radiation alone in UM-SCC6 xenografts. Xenografts treated with motesanib showed a reduction of vessel penetration into tumor parenchyma, compared with control tumors. Furthermore, triple immunohistochemical staining for vasculature, proliferation, and hypoxia showed well-defined spatial relationships among these parameters in HNSCC xenografts. Motesanib significantly enhanced intratumoral hypoxia in the presence and absence of fractionated radiation.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> These studies identify a favorable interaction when combining radiation and motesanib in HNSCC models. The data presented suggest that motesanib reduces blood vessel penetration into tumors and thereby increases intratumoral hypoxia. These findings suggest that clinical investigations examining combinations of radiation and motesanib are warranted in HNSCC. Clin Cancer Res; 16(14); 3639–47. ©2010 AACR.</p></div>

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.