Abstract

<div>Abstract<p><b>Purpose:</b><i>EML4</i>–<i>ALK</i> fusions define a subset of lung cancers that can be effectively treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors. Unfortunately, the duration of response is heterogeneous and acquired resistance limits their ultimate efficacy. Thus, a better understanding of resistance mechanisms will help to enhance tumor control in <i>EML4</i>–<i>ALK</i>-positive tumors.</p><p><b>Experimental Design:</b> By applying orthogonal functional mutagenesis screening approaches, we screened for mutations inducing resistance to the aminopyridine PF02341066 (crizotinib) and/or the diaminopyrimidine TAE684.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Here, we show that the resistance mutation, L1196M, as well as other crizotinib resistance mutations (F1174L and G1269S), are highly sensitive to the structurally unrelated ALK inhibitor TAE684. In addition, we identified two novel <i>EML4</i>–<i>ALK</i> resistance mutations (L1198P and D1203N), which unlike previously reported mutations, induced resistance to both ALK inhibitors. An independent resistance screen in <i>ALK</i>-mutant neuroblastoma cells yielded the same L1198P resistance mutation but defined two additional mutations conferring resistance to TAE684 but not to PF02341066.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our results show that different <i>ALK</i> resistance mutations as well as different ALK inhibitors impact the therapeutic efficacy in the setting of <i>EML4</i>–<i>ALK</i> fusions and <i>ALK</i> mutations. <i>Clin Cancer Res; 17(23); 7394–401. ©2011 AACR</i>.</p></div>

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call