Abstract

BackgroundAlthough considerable evidence exists about the effectiveness of audit coupled with feedback, very few audit-with-feedback interventions have been done in either home care or supportive living settings to date. With little history of audit and feedback in home care or supportive living there is potential for greater effects, at least initially. This study extends the work of an earlier study designed to assess the effects of an audit-with-feedback intervention. It will be delivered quarterly over a one-year period in seven home care offices and 11 supportive living sites. The research questions are the same as in the first study but in a different environment. They are as follows:1. What effects do feedback reports have on processes and outcomes over time?2. How do different provider groups in home care and supportive living sites respond to feedback reports based on quality indicator data?MethodsThe research team conducting this study includes researchers and decision makers in continuing care in the province of Alberta, Canada. The intervention consists of quarterly feedback reports in 19 home care offices and supportive living sites across Alberta. Data for the feedback reports are based on the Resident Assessment Instrument Home Care tool, a standardized instrument mandated for use in home care and supportive living environments throughout Alberta. The feedback reports consist of one page, printed front and back, presenting both graphic and textual information. Reports are delivered to all employees working in each site. The primary evaluation uses a controlled interrupted time-series design, both adjusted and unadjusted for covariates. The concurrent process evaluation includes observation, focus groups, and self-reports to assess uptake of the feedback reports. The project described in this protocol follows a similar intervention conducted in our previous study, Data for Improvement and Clinical Excellence--Long-Term Care. We will offer dissemination strategies and spread of the feedback report approach in several ways suited to various audiences and stakeholders throughout Alberta.SignificanceThis study will generate knowledge about the effects of an audit with feedback intervention in home care and supportive living settings. Our dissemination activities will focus on supporting sites to continue to use the Resident Assessment Instrument data in their quality improvement activities.

Highlights

  • Considerable evidence exists about the effectiveness of audit coupled with feedback, very few audit-with-feedback interventions have been done in either home care or supportive living settings to date

  • In order to increase use of evidence-based practice and subsequently improve care in home care (HC) and supportive living (SL), the relationships between the assessment findings and their usefulness and applicability, including how well they are understood by healthcare providers, must be explored; one way to do this is through the use of audit and feedback as a quality-improvement strategy

  • Primary purpose and study objectives The primary purpose of the Data for Improvement and Clinical Excellence (DICE) project is to assess the effects of an audit with feedback intervention in all three streams of continuing care: longterm care (LTC), HC, and SL

Read more

Summary

Methods

The overall intervention evaluation uses a controlled interrupted time-series design with quarterly feedback reports in the seven HC offices and 11 SL sites across Alberta. Obtain the operation approvals to conduct the study at all involved facilities DICE home care protocol paper DICE research team meetings obtain the research approvals from participating sites KDF submitted the interim report to CHSRF (April 12 2011) Information sessions/TREC survey at participating offices and sites post flyers for information sessions obtain RAI HC data from North Central and South Zones (May 24 2011) obtain RAI HC data from Calgary Zone (June 3, 2011) report generating and printing add Edmonton site to the study starting the second quarter prepare information packages, order refreshments quarterly feedback report distribution to HC/SL offices post feedback report surveys at HC/SL offices data analysis/paper writing post-intervention data acquisition Dissemination activities DICE phase II substudies two and three submit ethics approval re the two substudies obtain the ethics approval. Our primary purpose is to offer the RAI coordinators in each of the settings tools, training, and technical support to implement their own local program of feedback report generation and distribution This implementation effort will be evaluated using a one-time survey in each participating setting to assess response to the feedback reports from all staff. This file contains an example of the feedback report used in Home care/Supportive living sites

Background
10. Government of Alberta Health and Wellness
15. Alberta Continuing Care Association
21. Alberta Health Services
24. Ajzen I
Findings
26. Search Canada
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call