Data-driven synthetic MRI FLAIR artifact correction via deep neural network.

Abstract

FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery) imaging via synthetic MRI methods leads to artifacts in the brain, which can cause diagnostic limitations. The main sources of the artifacts are attributed to the partial volume effect and flow, which are difficult to correct by analytical modeling. In this study, a deep learning (DL)-based synthetic FLAIR method was developed, which does not require analytical modeling of the signal. To correct artifacts in synthetic FLAIR using a DL method. Retrospective. A total of 80 subjects with clinical indications (60.6 ± 16.7 years, 38 males, 42 females) were divided into three groups: a training set (56 subjects, 62.1 ± 14.8 years, 25 males, 31 females), a validation set (1 subject, 62 years, male), and the testing set (23 subjects, 57.3 ± 20.4 years, 13 males, 10 females). 3 T MRI using a multiple-dynamic multiple-echo acquisition (MDME) sequence for synthetic MRI and a conventional FLAIR sequence. Normalized root mean square (NRMSE) and structural similarity (SSIM) were computed for uncorrected synthetic FLAIR and DL-corrected FLAIR. In addition, three neuroradiologists scored the three FLAIR datasets blindly, evaluating image quality and artifacts for sulci/periventricular and intraventricular/cistern space regions. Pairwise Student's t-tests and a Wilcoxon test were performed. For quantitative assessment, NRMSE improved from 4.2% to 2.9% (P < 0.0001) and SSIM improved from 0.85 to 0.93 (P < 0.0001). Additionally, NRMSE values significantly improved from 1.58% to 1.26% (P < 0.001), 3.1% to 1.5% (P < 0.0001), and 2.7% to 1.4% (P < 0.0001) in white matter, gray matter, and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) regions, respectively, when using DL-corrected FLAIR. For qualitative assessment, DL correction achieved improved overall quality, fewer artifacts in sulci and periventricular regions, and in intraventricular and cistern space regions. The DL approach provides a promising method to correct artifacts in synthetic FLAIR. 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1413-1423.