Data-driven model assessment: A comparative study for ship response determination

Abstract

Several machine learning approaches to determine ship responses via data-driven models have been applied. Input features and parameters used relied on time-series analyses obtained from computational-fluid-dynamics approach. As inputs into the data-driven model, the heave and pitch motions of a ship advancing in irregular, i.e., natural seaway were considered. By using different models in the framework of machine learning, required computation for the associated ship motions may be avoided, thus reducing the computational effort to forecast ship motions. Comparative predictions with numerical simulations revealed that the deep-neural-network method for training in auto-machine-learning instructions yielded the highest accuracy in heave motion, resulting in a non-normalized mean-absolute-error of 0.74, against the corresponding error of 1.07 from numerical computations, whereas the method trained with the tree-based models (the extreme gradient boosting and the Hist gradient boosting regressor) predicted less accurate motions for the tested ship. The model trained with the random forest regressor exhibited an error of 1.10. Numerical simulation based on a field method proved to be the most suitable choice for pitch motion. Despite the few samples available to train the regressors, results demonstrated that the measured data was sufficient to assess the developed data-driven model for ship response determination.