Abstract
AbstractWhile decomposition techniques in mathematical programming are usually designed for numerical efficiency, coordination problems within enterprise‐wide optimization are often limited by organizational rather than numerical considerations. We propose a “data‐driven” coordination framework which manages to recover the same optimum as the equivalent centralized formulation while allowing coordinating agents to retain autonomy, privacy, and flexibility over their own objectives, constraints, and variables. This approach updates the coordinated, or shared, variables based on derivative‐free optimization (DFO) using only coordinated variables to agent‐level optimal subproblem evaluation “data.” We compare the performance of our framework using different DFO solvers (CUATRO, Py‐BOBYQA, DIRECT‐L, GPyOpt) against conventional distributed optimization (ADMM) on three case studies: collaborative learning, facility location, and multiobjective blending. We show that in low‐dimensional and nonconvex subproblems, the exploration‐exploitation trade‐offs of DFO solvers can be leveraged to converge faster and to a better solution than in distributed optimization.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.