Data, Disparity, and Sentencing Debates: Lessons from the TRAC Report on Inter-Judge Disparity

Abstract

Research Article| October 01 2012 Data, Disparity, and Sentencing Debates: Lessons from the TRAC Report on Inter-Judge Disparity Paul J. Hofer Paul J. Hofer Editor, Federal Sentencing Reporter; Adjunct Assistant Professor, Johns Hopkins University; Sentencing Policy Analyst, Sentencing Resource Counsel, Project of the Federal Public Defenders Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Federal Sentencing Reporter (2012) 25 (1): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2012.25.1.37 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Paul J. Hofer; Data, Disparity, and Sentencing Debates: Lessons from the TRAC Report on Inter-Judge Disparity. Federal Sentencing Reporter 1 October 2012; 25 (1): 37–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2012.25.1.37 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentFederal Sentencing Reporter Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2012 Vera Institute of Justice. All rights reserved. Please direct requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press's Rights and Permissions website, http://www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintInfo.asp2012 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.