Abstract
Learning outcome, student achievement and academic achievement are some of the variables that get a lot of attention in educational research. Nevertheless, from several national studies collected there are inconsistencies in particular with regard to English terminology as well as inconsistencies in methods and instruments of data collection. Therefore, this study aims to explain the different methods of data collection research on learning outcome, achievement learning, and academic achievement. This study is a study desk study using literature review to explain the different methods of data collection on learning outcome, student achievement, and academic achievement. Based on the results of research can be concluded that the method of data collection of learning outcome, can be done through three ways, namely, perception survey, interview, and forum group discussion (FGD). While the instruments that can be used to collect data learning results are questionnaires, interview guides and minutes. Methods of collecting research data about student achievement, can be done through two ways namely, (1) test and (2) non test. Data collection methods of academic achievement can be done through documentation.
Highlights
Learning outcome, student achievement, and academic achievement are some variables that are often the object of study in research
There is no similar perception of the researchers especially in Indonesia for understanding the terminology, dimensions and collecting data methods on learning outcome (Arjanggi & Suprihatin, 2010; Purwatiningsi, 2013; Rahayu, Susanto, & Yulianti, 2011; Setiawan, 2008; Situmorang, 2013), student achievements (Deta, 2013, & Widha, 2013; Elis Mediawati, 2011; Hamdu & Agustina, 2011; Siagian, 2012; Syarif, 2012) and academic achievement (Rais, 2010; Warsito, 2009) on their research
Academic achievement is a quantitative data generated by students from the assessment process of learning outcome in a learning (Slavin, 2005)
Summary
Student achievement, and academic achievement are some variables that are often the object of study in research. There is no similar perception of the researchers especially in Indonesia for understanding the terminology, dimensions and collecting data methods on learning outcome (Arjanggi & Suprihatin, 2010; Purwatiningsi, 2013; Rahayu, Susanto, & Yulianti, 2011; Setiawan, 2008; Situmorang, 2013), student achievements (Deta, 2013, & Widha, 2013; Elis Mediawati, 2011; Hamdu & Agustina, 2011; Siagian, 2012; Syarif, 2012) and academic achievement (Rais, 2010; Warsito, 2009) on their research. All researchers use the same instrument that is a matter of tests in taking data both learning outcome, student achievement, and academic achievement. Dimensions of learning outcome in this study include three things, namely (1) cognitive performance, (2) effective and (3) psychomotor. Measurement of student learning outcome of cognitive aspects using test questions on (1) mastery of concepts, and (2) problem-solving performance. This study does not explain the learning objectives as well as the specific content of the biological subjects that are framed
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan dan Konseling
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
