Data collection after massive natural disasters (focusing on Bam earthquake, Iran)

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this study is to explore mortality data collection after a destructive earthquake in Bam, Iran.Design/methodology/approachThis is a case study of mortality data collection using a qualitative approach. The study data were collected through interviews with people involved with data collection and processing in Iran, and an evaluation of routinely collected data.FindingsThe results indicated that there were many limitations affecting data collection after the earthquake. These limitations are rooted in basic problems within the existing data collection system and a lack of co‐ordination between the groups collecting data, including national and international aid groups that provided help after the earthquake.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is based on a very large and destructive earthquake; the results may be different for other natural disasters such as floods.Practical implicationsThe main target group of this study is the decision makers involved with the disaster relief issues at national and international levels. This issue of data collection is imperative for future disaster aid.Originality/valueThe study highlights the problems affecting routine collection of mortality data after a disaster, arising from the scant attention paid to proper documentation.