Abstract

The principle that a distinction must be made between selection and award criteria has been part of general knowledge in public procurement law since the well-known Beentjes decision of the ECJ. In practice, however, this distinction is still difficult to make. The author examines the understanding of the relationship between the two groups of criteria developed in European and German public procurement law and compares it with the system of "contractor qualifications" and "evaluation criteria" applicable in U.S. public procurement law. Suggestions are developed as to how the fundamental distinction between procurement and award criteria can be implemented de lege lata and understood de lege ferenda.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.