Abstract
Is taking the moral stance an adaptation? Can we explain being moral biologically or evolutionarily? Some say no. Others say yes, believing that only an evolutionary perspective can ground moral judgments. And still others (Ruse) believe that taking the evolutionary perspective undermines objective foundations for moral realism. Mizzoni defends the view that an evolutionary perspective on morality does not undermine moral realism. Mizzoni looks at arguments to the contrary by Michael Ruse and defends, against Ruse, the view that objective moral truths are compatible with a contingent human evolved nature in which those truths are based. Not unlike a linguist who argues for a shared, innate grammar, Mizzoni argues for a shared universal human nature in which could be grounded a deep structure to morality.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.