Abstract

The local density of dark matter is an important quantity. On the one hand, its value is needed for dark matter direct detection searches. On the other hand, a precise and robust determination of the local dark matter density would help us learn about the shape of the dark matter halo of our Galaxy, which plays an important role in dark matter indirect detection searches, as well as in many studies in astrophysics and cosmology. There are different methods available to determine the local dark matter density. Among them, it is common to study either the vertical kinematics of a selected group of tracers or the rotation curve of the Milky Way. Recent estimates of the local dark matter density have used the precise observations conducted by the ESA/Gaia mission. However, in spite of the quality of the data released by Gaia’s observations, different analyses of the local dark matter density produce dissimilar results. After a brief review of the most common methods to estimate the local density of dark matter, here we argue about different explanations for the discrepancies in the results of recent analyses. We finish by presenting new approaches that have been proposed in the literature and could help us improve our knowledge of this important quantity.

Highlights

  • Since the first studies by [1] and [2], there has been almost a century of estimates of the local dark matter density

  • Knowing ρDM, is important for indirect detection dark matter (DM) searches and for those studies in cosmology and astrophysics that depend on the distribution of DM in the Milky Way

  • The most common local method is based on the study of the vertical kinematics of stars and it is known as the vertical Jeans equation method, while the most common global method makes use of the rotation curve of the Galaxy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the first studies by [1] and [2], there has been almost a century of estimates of the local dark matter density (ρDM, ). Each time new and more accurate data became available, the estimates of ρDM, became compatible within a closer range of values, with the increasing precision limited by the assumptions made in the analyses. The situation has not converged with the incoming of Gaia’s observations

Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call