Abstract

We use a large dark matter simulation of a LambdaCDM model to investigate the clustering and environmental dependence of the number of substructures in a halo. Focusing on redshift z=1, we find that the halo occupation distribution is sensitive at the tens of percent level to the surrounding density and to a lesser extent to asymmetry of the surrounding density distribution. We compute the autocorrelation function of halos as a function of occupation, building on the finding of Wechsler et al. (2006) and Gao and White (2007) that halos (at fixed mass) with more substructure are more clustered. We compute the relative bias as a function of occupation number at fixed mass, finding a strong relationship. At fixed mass, halos in the top 5% of occupation can have an autocorrelation function ~ 1.5-2 times higher than the mean. We also compute the bias as a function of halo mass, for fixed halo occupation. We find that for group and cluster sized halos, when the number of subhalos is held fixed, there is a strong anticorrelation between bias and halo mass. Such a relationship represents an additional challenge to the halo model.

Highlights

  • The halo model of galaxy clustering takes as one of its usual assumptions that the clustering of a dark matter halo is dictated solely by its mass

  • Focusing on redshift z = 1, we find that the halo occupation distribution is sensitive at the tens of percent level to the surrounding density and to a lesser extent to asymmetry of the surrounding density distrbution

  • We find that for group and cluster sized halos, when the number of subhalos is held fixed, there is a strong anticorrelation between bias and halo mass

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The halo model of galaxy clustering (see Cooray and Sheth 2002 for a review) takes as one of its usual assumptions that the clustering of a dark matter halo is dictated solely by its mass. In this paper we examine the role of the number of subhalos in a halo on clustering in two different ways, first by studing the environments (nearby overdensity) of halos and second by computing the correlation function. The clustering of halos can be probed in a different, related fashion by measuring properties of the local environment. In this case to first order the dependence of halo properties on environment was shown to be limited to mass by Lemson & Kaufmann (1999).

SIMULATION
Halos and Subhalos
Environment
Halo occupation at fixed halo mass: definition
Spatial distribution
HALO OCCUPATION DISTRIBUTION
Density dependence
Resolution test
Other environmental factors
CLUSTERING
Autocorrelation function
Large scale bias at fixed halo mass and at fixed occupation
Findings
Summary
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.