Abstract
Daniel Berlyne’s work influences many members of the Society: Yet in many respects, he was not a typical psychonome. We are researching a biography of Berlyne, and this paper presents some early working hypotheses for comment and criticisms of psychonomes who knew him or his work.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
