Abstract

It is largely consented that the bicycle is a sustainable mobility alternative in the city. Despite its many benefits, cycling comprises risks of injury or death. Among others, these risks are a result of unsafe overtaking manoeuvres performed by motorized vehicles against cyclists. This study aims to identify the characteristics of the road network and traffic influencing the lateral distance and duration of overtaking. Using bicycles equipped with distance sensors, GPS, and cameras, four cyclists covered 1689 km in Montréal. Hence, 3591 overtakings were identified with an average distance of 176 cm; 111 overtaking manoeuvres took place at distances less than 1 m, resulting in an unsafe event for every 32 overtakings. On average, the duration of an overtaking was 1.082 s and dangerous overtakings (less than one metre) lasted 0.57 s more than safe overtakings (one metre and over). A generalized additive logit model (GAM) is built to predict the likelihood of a dangerous lateral passing (less than 1 m). The results show that in taking a major route, the presence of parked vehicles and the time required for overtaking significantly increase the probability of experiencing a dangerous overtaking. However, the participant, type of vehicle, or presence of a bike lane have no significant effect. Therefore, the results demonstrate the importance of keeping cyclists isolated from traffic. Furthermore, providing a bike path along parking spaces seems to be a solution that does not enhance cyclist safety.

Highlights

  • Academic Editors: Garrett MattosToday, the bicycle is a sustainable mobility alternative for numerous actors

  • 3591 overtaking manoeuvres were registered with an average of 176 cm, the minimal distance registered being 47 cm

  • More than one-quarter of overtakings took place in the presence of vehicles parked on the road (n = 988, 27.5%) and 13% when the cyclist was riding on a bicycle path or a shared lane

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Academic Editors: Garrett MattosToday, the bicycle is a sustainable mobility alternative for numerous actors. According to Garrard et al [1], these benefits can be separated into three categories: improvement of health due to an increase in physical activity, psychosocial benefits for mental health, and environmental benefits (reduction of atmospheric and noise pollution, and road congestion) Despite these individual and collective benefits, cycling in the city comprises risks of injury and death associated with collisions with motorized vehicles, and in cities where the cycling network is underdeveloped and/or not separate from automobile traffic [2,3]. This situation is especially prevalent in North. On the island of Montréal (QC, Canada), only 24% of the cyclable network corresponds to lanes exclusively dedicated to cyclists (isolated from traffic) [5,6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call