Dammed coastal waterways are less diverse, more homogenous, and dominated by non-native species: Comprehensive insights from quantitative analysis of environmental DNA

Abstract

Small dams are commonplace worldwide and impact local and regional aquatic diversity by altering habitats and disrupting dispersal networks. Quantifying the local and regional impacts of dams requires nearly comprehensive species occurrence data. We used environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to test theoretical predictions about the impacts of dams on local and regional bony fish diversity within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA. We analyzed eDNA from 465 sampling points within 34 waterbodies documenting the distributions of 61 species. On average, dammed waterbodies had approximately half (48 %) as many species per site as undammed (lower alpha diversity) and more homogenous species composition (lower beta diversity). Native migratory species were less than one tenth (0.08) as likely to be detected at dammed sites than undammed sites, native resident (non-migratory) species were one third (0.34) as likely, whereas introduced species were 2.6 times more likely to be detected. Our sampling and bioinformatics methods were validated by a diverse mock community control. Our results suggest that dams in coastal waterways homogenize fish metacommunities, reduce local biodiversity through dispersal limitation and habitat alteration, and favor the dominance of lentic-adapted introduced species while potentially restricting the spread of introduced catfish. Decisions to construct or decommission dams should consider local and regional impacts on biodiversity.