Abstract

Background and objectives: Motor neglect (MN) is a clinically important condition whereby patients with unilateral brain lesions fail to move their contralateral limbs, despite normal muscle strength, reflexes, and sensation. MN has been associated with various lesion sites, including the parietal and frontal cortex, the internal capsule, the lenticulostriate nuclei, and the thalamus. In the present study, we explored the hypothesis that MN depends on a dysfunction of the medial motor system by performing a detailed anatomical analysis in four patients with MN.Methods: Ten patients participated in the study: four with MN, four with left visual neglect but without MN, and three patients with left hemiplegia without MN. We used specific scales for clinical and neuropsychological assessment. We drew the lesion borders directly onto the original brain images of each patient, and plotted the lesions on anatomical atlases for gray and white matter.Results: Lesion locations were highly heterogeneous in our MN patients, and included frontal and parietal sites, basal ganglia, and white matter. The only consistently damaged structure across all MN patients was the cingulum bundle, a major pathway of the medial motor system important for motor initiative, and a key connection with limbic structures crucial for motivational aspects of actions. Three MN patients with additional damage to lateral fronto-parietal networks had also signs of contralesional visual neglect. The cingulum bundle was intact in all the control patients with visual neglect or hemiplegia.Conclusions: Cingulum damage may induce MN through unilateral dysfunction of the medial motor system. Additional lateral fronto-parietal dysfunction can result in the association with visual neglect.

Highlights

  • Patients with unilateral brain damage may display underutilization of contralesional limbs that cannot be explained by primary sensori-motor deficits (Punt et al, 2013; Sampanis and Riddoch, 2013)

  • Lesion locations were highly heterogeneous in our motor neglect (MN) patients, and included frontal and parietal sites, basal ganglia, and white matter

  • The cingulum bundle was intact in all the control patients with visual neglect or hemiplegia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patients with unilateral brain damage may display underutilization of contralesional limbs that cannot be explained by primary sensori-motor deficits (Punt et al, 2013; Sampanis and Riddoch, 2013). This condition, known as motor neglect (MN) (Laplane and Degos, 1983), entails important clinical problems, because these patients may behave as if they were hemiplegic. Laplane and Degos (1983) collected 20 patients over more than 10 years In their series, MN was not always associated with “sensory” (i.e., visuospatial) neglect.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call