Damage-associated molecular patterns in bacteraemic infection, including a comparative analysis with bacterial DNA, a pathogen-associated molecular pattern.

Abstract

Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are key triggers of inflammation in sepsis. However, they have rarely been studied simultaneously. Thus, in the present study of patients with bacteraemic infection, we aimed to study how DAMP dynamics are linked to disease severity and outcome and to compare diagnostic and prognostic properties of a DAMP and a previously analysed PAMP (16S rDNA). In a prospective study of adult patients hospitalized with culture-proven community-onset bacteraemic infection, caused by Streptococcus pneumonia (n = 30), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 27), or Escherichia coli (n = 26), dynamics of a PAMP, i.e. 16S rDNA, have previously been presented. For the present study, blood samples obtained on hospital days 1-2 (when blood culture was positive), 3-4, 7 ± 1, 14 ± 2, and 28 ± 4 were analysed for four different DAMPs, i.e., nuclear DNA (nDNA), mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), heat shock protein 90 alpha (HSP90α), and extracellular high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1). Sepsis was defined according to the Sepsis-3 criteria. The study outcomes were sepsis at admission and negative outcome, defined as intensive care unit (ICU) admission and/or death within 60days. Of 83 study patients, sepsis was noted in 41 patients (49%) and a negative outcome was noted in 17 patients (20%). nDNA had areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of 0.78 for sepsis and 0.76 for negative outcome, which were higher than those of the other DAMPs and additional biomarkers (CRP, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10). The nDNA and positive 16S rDNA results on day 1-2 were correlated with each other (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that high day 1-2 concentrations of both nDNA and 16S rDNA were independently associated with sepsis. In addition, high day 1-2 concentration of nDNA was independently associated with negative outcomes. While 16S rDNA dissipated from the circulation within days, nDNA concentrations remained elevated throughout the follow-up period in patients with negative outcome. In conclusion,nDNA outperformed the other DAMPs regarding sepsis detection and outcome prediction. Both nDNA (a DAMP) and 16S rDNA (a PAMP) were independently linked to sepsis; nDNA was also associated with negative outcomes and persisted elevated in such cases. This highlights nDNA as an interesting marker within sepsis pathogenesis and as a promising clinical biomarker, warranting further studies.