Dalbavancin for the treatment of bone and joint infections: A meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundBone and joint infections are challenging infectious diseases to treat and require prolonged antimicrobial treatment. Dalbavancin demonstrated promising pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties for the treatment of these infections. The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of dalbavancin to standard of care (SOC) for the treatment of bone and joint infections. MethodsTwo independent authors performed a comprehensive search through the major databases up to September 2023. Interventional and observational studies that compared the clinical success of dalbavancin to SOC for the treatment of osteoarticular infections (OAI) were included. ResultsA total of 6 studies and 581 patients were included, 282 in dalbavancin group and 299 in SOC group. Only one study was randomized clinical trial. When the data from the 6 studies were pooled in a meta-analysis, clinical success did not differ in those who received dalbavancin versus SOC (OR = 1.55, 95 % CI = 0.95–2.55, I-squared = 15.89 %) for the treatment of OAI infections. Four studies compared the two groups in terms of hospital length of stay and demonstrated a significant shorter length of stay in dalbavancin group compared to SOC group. Treatment-emergent adverse effects were reported in up to 21.4 % of patients in the dalbavancin group and up to 36.7 % of patients in the SOC group. ConclusionThis meta-analysis showed that dalbavancin is as effective as SOC for the treatment of patients with OAI infections. More data are needed to validate these findings.