Abstract

Simple SummaryAlthough on-farm euthanasia is a critical component of dairy management and provides a way to alleviate animal suffering, little is known about dairy caretaker perspectives on their role in euthanasia, their comfort level with the procedures, and the impact of practicing euthanasia on their wellbeing and mental health. Thematic analysis of focus groups and interviews of Colorado dairy caretakers revealed a human–animal bond and empathy toward animals in all participants. Training practices were varied and correlated with knowledge about euthanasia procedures and language used to discuss euthanasia. Participants reported that little communication about the stress related to performing euthanasia occurred on the farm, and there was no awareness of mental health resources available to caretakers. Testing of interventions that can support animal caretakers by reducing euthanasia-related stress and improving emotional wellbeing, and efforts to increase awareness of mental health recourses are clear needs for dairy operations.The objectives of this study were to identify caretakers’ perceptions and stressors related to performing on-farm euthanasia as well as potential ideas for intervention strategies to alleviate negative effects of performing euthanasia on caretaker well-being. Additionally, we aimed to determine how euthanasia methods, procedures, and training correlate with dairy caretakers’ attitudes toward performing on-farm euthanasia and their job satisfaction and sense of well-being. Thirty-eight dairy caretakers (19 workers, 15 supervisors, 3 owners, 1 veterinarian) participated in focus groups or interviews conducted and recorded on five Northern Colorado dairies. Thematic analysis of focus group and interview transcripts revealed seven recurring themes. Variation in available training and euthanasia protocols among dairy farms was evident. There was a lack of awareness regarding available mental health resources and little communication between farm personnel about euthanasia-related stress. Training was correlated with caretaker knowledge about euthanasia procedures and the language used to refer to euthanasia. Human-animal bonds and empathy toward animals were evident in participants regardless of training, job position, or dairy experience. Interventions such as training programs, mental health resources, and other support systems should be tested for effectiveness in addressing euthanasia-related stressors, improving euthanasia decision-making and practice, and increasing animal wellbeing on dairy farms.

Highlights

  • Euthanasia is an essential management tool in all animal industries and is used as a means to end animal suffering when recovery is unlikely, and quality of life is compromised

  • Thirty-eight caretakers from five Northeastern Colorado dairy operations agreed to participate in this study

  • Training was associated with knowledge of euthanasia and the language used to describe the process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Euthanasia is an essential management tool in all animal industries and is used as a means to end animal suffering when recovery is unlikely, and quality of life is compromised. Evidence of the “moral stress” [1] caused by performing euthanasia has been well documented in animal shelters and at veterinary clinics. It is known that employees who perform euthanasia as a part of their job experience work-related stress, stress-induced physical ailments, depression, unresolved grief reactions, work-family conflict, burnout, and dissatisfaction with their work [2,3,4,5]. Animal shelter staff report sadness, crying, anger, and depression in response to performing repeated euthanasia [4]. Performing euthanasia has been indicated as contributing to the prevalence of suicide risk and psychological distress in veterinarians [6,7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call