Abstract

Theory states that residential segregation may have a strong impact on people’s life opportunities. It is unclear, however, to what extent the residential environment is a good representation of overall exposure to different people and environments. Daily mobility could reduce the negative effects of segregation if people change environments and/or become more mixed. They could also enhance existing segregation patterns if daily mobility produces more segregated environments. This article uses mobile phone data to track daily mobility patterns with regard to residential segregation. We test the extent to which patterns differ between residents in immigrant-dense areas and those from areas with a greater proportion of natives. Results suggest, in line with previous research, that daily mobility patterns are strongly segregated. Phones originating from more immigrant-dense areas are more likely to (1) remain in the home area and (2) move towards other immigrant-dense areas. Hence, although mobility does mitigate segregation to some extent, most people are mainly exposed to people and neighbourhoods who live in similar segregated environments. These findings are especially interesting given the case study areas: two medium-sized Swedish regions with relatively low levels of segregation and inequality and short journey distances.

Highlights

  • Residential segregation is one of the major urban problems in contemporary Sweden, judging by the attention and number of recent publications by media, government, and academia

  • Uncertainty about actual exposure and a failure to take it into account—the ‘uncertain geographic context problem’ (Kwan, 2012)—is, according to Park and Kwan (2018), one of the most serious challenges facing neighbourhood effect research

  • The overall aim of the article is to compare and contrast daily mobility patterns from areas of different immigrant composition, in order to discuss how and if residential segregation is overcome by mobility

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Residential segregation is one of the major urban problems in contemporary Sweden, judging by the attention and number of recent publications by media, government, and academia. Related methodological problems when estimating neighbourhood effects are those of timing and duration of exposure (Galster, Andersson, & Musterd, 2016; Musterd, Galster, & Andersson, 2012). These challenges are often discussed in relation to the life course but are just as relevant on a day-to-day basis (Kwan, 2012; Park & Kwan, 2018). They are generally assumed to face the most serious negative consequences of segregation and are the target of most anti-segregation initiatives yet their exposure to deprivation risks being exaggerated if their daily exposure to more resourceful areas is not accounted for (Jones & Pebley, 2014; Kwan, 2018; Tan, Kwan, & Chen, 2020)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call