Abstract

The timing of leaf unfolding in temperate woody species is predominantly controlled by the seasonal course of temperature in late winter and early spring. However, quantifying lagged temperature effects on spring phenology is still challenging. Here, we aimed at investigating lagged and potentially non-linear effects of daily maximum temperatures on the probability of leaf unfolding in temperate woody species growing across large elevational gradients. We analyzed 5280 observations of leaf-out time of four tree species (European beech, horse chestnut, European larch, Norway spruce) and one shrub species (common hazel) that were recorded by volunteers over 40 years at 42 locations in Switzerland. We used a case-crossover sampling design to match leaf-out dates with control dates (i.e., dates before or after leaf-out), and analyzed these data with conditional logistic regression accounting for lagged temperature effects over 60 days. Multivariate meta-analyses were used to synthesize lagged temperature and elevational effects on leaf unfolding across multiple phenological stations. Temperature effects on the probability of leaf unfolding were largest at relatively short lags (i.e., within ca. 10 days) and decreased with increasing lags. Short- to mid-term effects (i.e., within ca. 10 to 20 days) were larger for late-leafing species known to be photoperiod-sensitive (beech, Norway spruce). Temperature effects increased for the broadleaved species (horse chestnut, hazel, beech) with decreasing elevation, particularly within ca. 10 to 40 days, i.e., leaf unfolding occurs more rapidly at low elevations for a given daily maximum temperature. Our novel findings provide evidence of cumulative and long-term temperature effects on leaf unfolding, whereby the efficiency of relatively high temperatures to trigger leaf-out becomes higher shortly before bud burst. These lagged associations between temperature and leaf unfolding improve our understanding of phenological responses across temperate woody species with differing ecological requirements that occur along elevational gradients.

Highlights

  • In temperate ecosystems, recurring biological phenomena are predominantly controlled by the cyclic, seasonal course of weather conditions (Forrest and Miller-Rushing, 2010; Schwartz, 2013)

  • Leaf unfolding was observed when relatively high daily maximum temperatures (Tmax) prevailed, which increased from early- to late-leafing species (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S1): larch, 14.6 ± 4.7◦C; horse chestnut, 15.0 ± 4.9◦C; hazel, 15.1 ± 5.0◦C; beech, 16.3 ± 4.9◦C; Norway spruce, 17.0 ± 4.6◦C

  • The expected Tmax during the day of observed leaf unfolding decreased with increasing elevation for all species (Figure 3): larch, −0.22◦C/100 m; horse chestnut, −0.41◦C/100 m; hazel, −0.27◦C/100 m; beech, −0.38◦C/100 m; Norway spruce, −0.25◦C/100 m

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In temperate ecosystems, recurring biological phenomena are predominantly controlled by the cyclic, seasonal course of weather conditions (Forrest and Miller-Rushing, 2010; Schwartz, 2013). Temperature is a key environmental driver of the timing of trees’ spring phenophases such as leaf unfolding or flowering (Chuine, 2000; Polgar and Primack, 2011), with photoperiod playing an additional role for some species (Basler and Körner, 2012; Way and Montgomery, 2015). Endodormancy from early fall to mid-winter, which is induced by chilling temperatures and shorter days and further regulated by physiological mechanisms occurring within the buds (Horvath et al, 2003). 5◦C; Chuine, 2000; Polgar and Primack, 2011) and increasing day length in early spring induce bud burst and leaf unfolding. Formulating and testing hypotheses about potential temperature effects on leaf unfolding remains challenging due to (1) the contrasting effects of chilling and forcing on bud development (Cannell and Smith, 1983; Murray et al, 1989), (2) the loosely defined ranges of chilling and forcing temperatures (Chuine, 2000; Luedeling et al, 2013; Delpierre et al, 2016), (3) the gradual transitions between or the overlap of the three dormancy phases (Cooke et al, 2012), (4) the relative importance of photoperiod versus temperature (Chuine et al, 2010; Körner and Basler, 2010; Vitasse and Basler, 2013), and (5)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call