Abstract

BackgroundImmunogenetic evidence indicates that cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) specific for the weak CTL antigen HBZ limit HTLV-1 proviral load in vivo, whereas there is no clear relationship between the proviral load and the frequency of CTLs specific for the immunodominant antigen Tax. In vivo, circulating HTLV-1-infected cells express HBZ mRNA in contrast, Tax expression is typically low or undetectable. To elucidate the virus-suppressing potential of CTLs targeting HBZ, we compared the ability of HBZ- and Tax-specific CTLs to lyse naturally-infected cells, by co-incubating HBZ- and Tax-specific CTL clones with primary CD4+ T cells from HLA-matched HTLV-1-infected donors. We quantified lysis of infected cells, and tested whether specific virus-induced host cell surface molecules determine the susceptibility of infected cells to CTL-mediated lysis.ResultsPrimary infected cells upregulated HLA-A*02, ICAM-1, Fas and TRAIL-R1/2 in concert with Tax expression, forming efficient targets for both HTLV-1-specific CTLs and CTLs specific for an unrelated virus. We detected expression of HBZ mRNA (spliced isoform) in both Tax-expressing and non-expressing infected cells, and the HBZ26–34 epitope was processed and presented by cells transfected with an HBZ expression plasmid. However, when coincubated with primary cells, a high-avidity HBZ-specific CTL clone killed significantly fewer infected cells than were killed by a Tax-specific CTL clone. Finally, incubation with Tax- or HBZ-specific CTLs resulted in a significant decrease in the frequency of cells expressing high levels of HLA-A*02.ConclusionsHTLV-1 gene expression in primary CD4+ T cells non-specifically increases susceptibility to CTL lysis. Despite the presence of HBZ spliced-isoform mRNA, HBZ epitope presentation by primary cells is significantly less efficient than that of Tax.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12977-014-0116-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Immunogenetic evidence indicates that cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) specific for the weak Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) antigen HTLV-I basic leucine zipper factor (HBZ) limit Human T lymphotropic virus type-1 (HTLV-1) proviral load in vivo, whereas there is no clear relationship between the proviral load and the frequency of CTLs specific for the immunodominant antigen Tax

  • The aims of the present study were to quantify the efficiency of presentation of Tax and HBZ epitopes to CTLs by primary, naturally-infected cells, and to test the hypothesis that the efficiency of CTL target formation is determined by virus-induced expression of specific host molecules on the cell surface

  • Plus strand gene expression is kinetically linked to upregulation human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02, ICAM-1, Fas and TRAILR1/2 on naturally infected CD4+ T cells Initially, we characterised the phenotype of purified CD4+ T cells from HTLV-infected donors, both ex vivo and over 24 h culture in vitro

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Immunogenetic evidence indicates that cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) specific for the weak CTL antigen HBZ limit HTLV-1 proviral load in vivo, whereas there is no clear relationship between the proviral load and the frequency of CTLs specific for the immunodominant antigen Tax. In vivo, circulating HTLV-1-infected cells express HBZ mRNA in contrast, Tax expression is typically low or undetectable. To elucidate the virus-suppressing potential of CTLs targeting HBZ, we compared the ability of HBZ- and Tax-specific CTLs to lyse naturally-infected cells, by co-incubating HBZ- and Tax-specific CTL clones with primary CD4+ T cells from HLA-matched HTLV-1infected donors. Virus-specific CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTLs) in the peripheral blood of infected individuals are abundant and chronically activated. The program of viral gene expression in vivo plays an important role determining which CTL epitopes are protective in chronic infection. The plus stand encodes the viral transactivating protein Tax and other structural and non-structural proteins, and the

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call