Abstract
In cases of gout with a low synovial fluid (SF) leukocyte count and atypical clinical presentation, such as in intercritical periods, the load of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals is frequently low, and thus, methods to improve the crystal detection may be beneficial. We compared the MSU crystal detection rates between cytospin slides and common smear preparations in low-cellular (<2,000/μl) SF samples of patients with gout. We determined the number of MSU crystals/15 high power fields (HPF) at × 1,000 magnification by polarised microscopy in cytospin preparations and smears in SF samples of 17 patients with MSU-crystal-proven gout and compared the two methods statistically. All of the cytospin slides (100 %) contained MSU crystals and showed a median number of 124 crystals/15 HPF (range 2-3,915), whereas 5 of the 17 smears (29 %) were MSU-crystal-negative, with a median count of 2 crystals/15 HPF (range 0-430/HPF). The difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, we have shown that the cytospin technique is superior to smears in the detection of MSU crystals in SF with a low SF leukocyte count. In light of our observations, we recommend the use of cytocentrifuges for routine crystal analysis in such cases.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
