Abstract

BackgroundCytoreductive surgery for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is controversial and is not routinely practiced. Cumulative literature in recent years, however, suggests a potential survival benefit associated with a greater extent of resection. MethodsA retrospective single institution cohort analysis of 58 consecutive patients with PCNSL was conducted between January 2011 and December 2020. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were compared between patients with and without cytoreductive surgery following diagnosis of PCNSL. The primary outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcome measures included time to remission (TTR), time to chemotherapy (TTC) and response to initial chemotherapy (RIC). ResultsForty-six patients (79.3 %) received stereotactic biopsy and 12 (20.6 %) underwent cytoreductive surgery. There was a trend towards longer OS (29.8 vs 22.3 months, p = 0.672), shorter TTR (4.0 vs 4.7 months, p = 0.362), and greater complete or near-complete radiographic RIC (81.8 % vs 67.6 %, p = 0.367) for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery. This correlated with a lesser need for whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (8.3 % vs 19.6 %, p = 0.359). ConclusionOur data suggests a potential benefit of cytoreductive surgery for selected patients diagnosed with PCNSL. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend towards improved OS, reduced TTR, greater RIC, and reduced WBRT requirement. Further studies with better randomization and statistical power are needed to validate this correlation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.