Abstract
Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common complication after pediatric liver transplantation (PLT), the optimal method for CMV prevention is uncertain and lacks multicentered investigation. We compared the effectiveness of short (<120 days) vs long (>180 days) CMV primary antiviral prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in PLT, through a prospective cohort study of primary PLT (aged <18 years) recipients enrolled in the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation registry from 2015 to 2019 with either donor or recipient CMV seropositivity. Participants were grouped into short or long prophylaxis based on their center’s practice and intended duration. In total, 199 PLT recipients were enrolled including 112 (56.3%) short and 87 (43.7%) long prophylaxis. End-organ disease was rare and similar between groups (2.7% and 1.1%; P = .45). CMV DNAemia and syndrome were more common in the short compared with those in long prophylaxis (26.8% vs 13.8%; P = .03; 18.8% vs 6.9%; P = .02). Neutropenia occurred more commonly with long prophylaxis (55.2% vs 16.1%; P < .001). Graft and patient survival were similar. Consideration of a short prophylaxis must weigh increased risk of CMV syndrome/DNAemia against medication burden and neutropenia of longer prophylaxis.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
