Cytologic distinction between bronchioalveolar carcinoma and reactive/reparative respiratory epithelium: A cytomorphometric analysis

Abstract

Cytologically, the distinction between bronchioalveolar carcinoma and reactive/reparative processes of respiratory epithelium can be difficult. Retrospectively, we have identified 11 consecutive cases of bronchioalveolar carcinoma from the cytology files of University Missouri-Kansas City/Truman Medical Center. On average, a combined 5.71 cytologic/histologic procedures were performed before reaching a definitive diagnosis for this group. An additional seven random cases of reactive/reparative respiratory cases of adult respiratory distress syndrome patients were used as a control. Cytomorphometric analysis was performed. The mean average nuclear diameter for the carcinoma group was 13.76 microns and for the reactive/reparative group was 13.29 microns. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (paired student t test, P > .05). It appears from our data that mean nuclear diameter is not a discriminator for the cytologic distinction between bronchioalveolar carcinoma and reactive/reparative respiratory epithelium and that the accepted cytologic parameters of for bronchioalveolar carcinoma are more valid.