Abstract

BackgroundThe recent emergence of a novel coronavirus in the Middle East (designated MERS-CoV) is a reminder of the zoonotic and pathogenic potential of emerging coronaviruses in humans. Clinical features of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) include atypical pneumonia and progressive respiratory failure that is highly reminiscent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by SARS-CoV. The host response is a key component of highly pathogenic respiratory virus infection. Here, we computationally analyzed gene expression changes in a human airway epithelial cell line infected with two genetically distinct MERS-CoV strains obtained from human patients, MERS-CoV SA 1 and MERS-CoV Eng 1.ResultsUsing topological techniques, including persistence homology and filtered clustering, we performed a comparative transcriptional analysis of human Calu-3 cell host responses to the different MERS-CoV strains, with MERS-CoV Eng 1 inducing early kinetic changes, between 3 and 12 hours post infection, compared to MERS-CoV SA 1. Robust transcriptional changes distinguished the two MERS-CoV strains predominantly at the late time points. Combining statistical analysis of infection and cytokine-stimulated Calu-3 transcriptomics, we identified differential innate responses, including up-regulation of extracellular remodeling genes following MERS-CoV Eng 1 infection and differential pro-inflammatory responses.ConclusionsThrough our genomics-based approach, we found topological differences in the kinetics and magnitude of the host response to MERS-CoV SA 1 and MERS-CoV Eng 1, with differential expression of innate immune and pro-inflammatory responsive genes as a result of IFN, TNF and IL-1α signaling. Predicted activation for STAT3 mediating gene expression relevant for epithelial cell-to-cell adherens and junction signaling in MERS-CoV Eng 1 infection suggest that these transcriptional differences may be the result of amino acid differences in viral proteins known to modulate innate immunity during MERS-CoV infection.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-1161) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • The recent emergence of a novel coronavirus in the Middle East is a reminder of the zoonotic and pathogenic potential of emerging coronaviruses in humans

  • Siu and colleagues showed that the block in IFN production is in part the result of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV p4a interaction with cellular dsRNA-binding protein PACT that interferes with the activation of Retinoic acid-inducible gene 1 (RIG-I)-like receptors RIG-I and Melanoma Differentiation-Associated protein 5 (MDA5) [7]

  • We took a genomics-based approach and assessed the whole transcriptome by microarray analysis to 1) topologically characterize the kinetic and magnitudinal changes in the host response elicited by MERS-CoV Eng 1 and MERS-CoV SA 1 and 2) identify contrasting genes between the two viruses related to innate and proinflammatory signal stimulation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The recent emergence of a novel coronavirus in the Middle East (designated MERS-CoV) is a reminder of the zoonotic and pathogenic potential of emerging coronaviruses in humans. Human cell culture models of MERS infection have shown a deficiency in interferon (IFN) induction and innate immune responses, which may in part result from multiple mechanisms of MERS-CoV regulation of host antiviral responses. In addition to accessory protein 4a (p4a), the MERS-CoV viral papain-like protease (PLpro) can block IFN-β induction, as well as downregulate expression of CCL5 and CXCL10 pro-inflammatory cytokine genes [5,6]. The expression of a panel of interferon-responsive genes, including DDX58 (encoding RIG-I), IL1B, and CXCL10, was undetectable in human airway epithelial (HAE) cultures infected with MERS-CoV SA 1, despite efficient viral replication [10]. Pre-treatment of HAE cells with recombinant IFN-α or IFN-λ suppressed MERSCoV SA 1 replication, indicating viral sensitivity to innate immune responses [10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call