Abstract

Not infrequently, physicians elect to divide CyA-ME from b.i.d. to t.i.d. dosing in an effort to minimize toxicity. Equivalent exposure is assumed. Few studies have compared 24-h PK profiles on both dosing regimes in the same patient. We retrospectively studied a heterogeneous population of seven pediatric patients (one heart transplant, five renal transplants and one FSGS patient) on both dosing regimes who had complete 24-h PK profiles on CyA-ME. Four patients were converted from b.i.d. to t.i.d. and three patients from t.i.d. to b.i.d. dosing. There was no difference in the dose/kg (5.66 +/- 2.52 mg/kg on b.i.d. dosing and 5.75 +/- 1.81 mg/kg on t.i.d. dosing, p = 0.8578, two-sided t-test). When comparing the dose-normalized AUCs over 24 h, every single patient demonstrated lower CyA-ME exposure on t.i.d. than on b.i.d. dosing with an average relative bioavailability that was 37.9% lower on t.i.d. than on b.i.d. dosing. The median dose-normalized AUC(0-->24h) dropped from 1620 ng x h x kg/mL x mg (range: 1253-4319) on b.i.d. to 1016 ng x h x kg/mL x mg (range: 712-1485, p = 0.02, Wilcoxon's matched pairs test) on t.i.d. dosing. Our results indicate t.i.d. dosing of CyA-ME results in significantly lower exposure when the same total dose is administered in two divided doses. This reduced exposure may potentially increase the risk for rejection.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.