Abstract

Based on two separate post-cyclone pilot surveys on evacuation behaviour during two category 4 tropical cyclones in Bangladesh—Gorky in 1991 and Sidr in 2007—this study attempts to explain why the overwhelming majority of cyclone victims did not participate in evacuation initiatives, irrespective of significant changes in cyclone preparedness in Bangladesh following 1991. Although the two surveys were conducted in different time horizons—one about 10 years following the catastrophic event (Gorky) and the other in the immediate aftermath of the event (Sidr)—the cyclone victims cited similar reasons for their lack of evacuation to designated cyclone shelters. Despite recent improvements in cyclone warning systems and a major expansion of public cyclone shelters in coastal Bangladesh, which are clearly reflected in significant increases in formal evacuation, from only 3 per cent of the Gorky respondents to 33 per cent of the Sidr respondents, the lack of adequate numbers of shelters and problems with the cyclone warning systems have been attributed by the respondents as the principal deterrents of evacuation to the designated shelters. Most of the other factors, such as problems with logistics, gender issues, anxiety about the security of possessions left at home, and respondents' perceptions and experience of the cyclone hazards, are consistent with the findings of previous studies on the Gorky event, in particular, and other studies on cyclone/hurricane evacuation, more generally.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.