Abstract

In recent years the pharmaceutical industry has benefited from the advances made in fragment‐based drug discovery (FBDD) with more than 30 fragment‐derived drugs currently marketed or progressing through clinical trials. The success of fragment‐based drug discovery is entirely dependent upon the composition of the fragment screening libraries used. Heterocycles are prevalent within marketed drugs due to the role they play in providing binding interactions; consequently, heterocyclic fragments are important components of FBDD libraries. Current screening libraries are dominated by flat, sp2‐rich compounds, primarily owing to their synthetic tractability, despite the superior physicochemical properties displayed by more three‐dimensional scaffolds. Herein, we report step‐efficient routes to a number of biologically relevant, fragment‐like heterocyclic spirocycles. The use of both electron‐deficient and electron‐rich 2‐atom donors was explored in complexity‐generating [3+2]‐cycloadditions to furnish products in 3 steps from commercially available starting materials. The resulting compounds were primed for further fragment elaboration through the inclusion of synthetic handles from the outset of the syntheses.

Highlights

  • Heterocycles play a vital role in drug discovery

  • This realisation has led to the development of new strategies and approaches towards drug discovery, including, but by no means limited to, diversity-oriented synthesis [6,7] (DOS) and fragment-based drug discovery[8,9,10] (FBDD)

  • Spirocycle 3 could be built after the key cycloaddition produced isoxazole 2, whereas spirocycle 7 could be formed during the key cycloaddition step on a saturated heterocycle (5 or 6)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The incorporated heteroatoms provide potential binding interactions and the cyclic nature limits structural flexibility, thereby reducing the entropic penalty of binding.[1,2] Heterocycles are prevalent in marketed drugs both as flat heteroaromatics and as saturated, fused or spirocyclic scaffolds. This variety is not representative of typical screening libraries, which are dominated by flat heteroaromatic scaffolds as opposed to more syntheticallychallenging, three-dimensional, saturated, heterocyclic scaffolds.[2]. As with HTS, the robust chemistry surrounding aromatic ring systems has led to a significant over-representation of flat, sp2-rich scaffolds.[13,14]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call