Abstract

This short communication offers a preliminary view on ongoing research conducted on the as-built EOS maraging steel 300. The material’s cyclic elastoplastic characteristics under strain-controlled loading have been investigated experimentally. Specimens fabricated under two primary orientations, horizontally and vertically to the build plate, have been tested. The obtained stress–strain hysteresis loops exhibited symmetry, with the vertical specimen showing a higher plastic strain energy dissipation capability than the horizontal specimen. Modelling of the material’s elastoplastic behaviour was performed with a commonly used kinematic hardening rule, combined with both isotropic and anisotropic yield functions and elasticity moduli. The obtained simulations of the hysteresis loops, from the implementation of these two plasticity models, indicate the advantage of the anisotropic modelling approach over the isotropic approach. The anisotropic plasticity model describes in a more representative way the inherent elastic and plastic anisotropy of the as-built material. Further research is underway to explore the low cycle fatigue performance of this additively manufactured metal.

Highlights

  • Maraging steel 300 (MS300), codified as American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) 18Ni300, is an alloy typically used for structural components requiring very high strength, such as tooling, moulds, aircraft landing gear, and rocket casings

  • MS300 has been popular in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing (AM), mainly due to its good weldability

  • The as-built EOS MS300 test coupons were strained to failure; only the data corresponding to the 28th cycle are reported and have been used in this analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As with most AM alloys, there has been substantial research conducted on the characterisation of the MS300’s mechanical properties under monotonic and cyclic loading. A wide array of results can be found on its monotonic (tensile/compressive) performance, e.g., [1,2,3,4,5,6], while cyclic response results have mostly been reported for its high cycle fatigue (HCF) performance (in the range of 105 –106 cycles, with the imposed stress/strain remaining within the elastic regime), e.g., [4,7,8,9]. For the full characterisation of the material’s mechanical properties, it is necessary to investigate its performance under cyclic loading. Published work on the performance of MS300 under low cycle fatigue (LCF) conditions (material loaded up to 103 cycles within the elastoplastic regime) is currently limited to a single study [10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call