Abstract
Shape-memory alloys are being progressively introduced as kernel components in seismic retrofitting devices for civil engineering structures. In order to control the instability associated with the first mechanical cycles, a training procedure is usually implemented, which stabilizes the superelastic behavior of the alloy. This paper addresses the characterization of the cyclic behavior of an austenitic NiTi alloy with emphasis on the definition of the instability functions associated with the cumulative residual strain and the variation of the critical stress needed to induce martensite. A wide set of experimental tensile tests are performed to study the influence of strain-rate and ambient temperature on the material coefficients controlling the described functions. A numerical model for shape-memory alloys is presented, which is able to simulate the instability phenomena associated with superelastic cycling in NiTi wires. It is shown that prior stabilization by initial training may not be advantageous, since it is during the first cycles that the alloy shows greater energy dissipation capabilities.
Highlights
Shape-Memory Alloys (SMAs) are a unique class of metallic alloys that exhibit the ability to develop a diffusionless phase transformation in solids called martensitic transformation
The present paper addresses the influence of strain-rate and ambient temperature on the material coefficients controlling the instability functions associated with the cycling loading of austenitic NiTi, providing an additional insight into the dynamic behavior of these alloys
The proposed range of strain-rates is wide enough to significantly change the shape of the superelastic hysteresis, clearly affecting the energy dissipation capabilities of the material, while keeping the temperature within the NiTi wires bounded throughout the cycling process
Summary
Shape-Memory Alloys (SMAs) are a unique class of metallic alloys that exhibit the ability to develop a diffusionless phase transformation in solids called martensitic transformation. The key parameters defining the cyclic instability of the superelastic hysteresis are the cumulative residual strain, εp and the variation of the critical stress needed to induce martensite, ∆σ.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Structural Glass and Advanced Materials Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.