Cyclic behavior of UHPC corner beam-column joints under bi-directional bending

Abstract

Design codes contain special provisions for anchorage lengths of flexural reinforcement and amount of transverse reinforcement in beam-column joints, to safeguard against joint failure and possible structural collapse. However, those stipulations could lead to congested joints with construction problems such as segregation. This study leverages experimental testing of eight corner beam-column joints under constant axial and cyclic bi-directional bending loads. In addition to being one of few on corner joints under a complex and practical loading, the study’s main aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) as a joint fill in lieu of normal strength concrete (NSC). Brittle failure, either by pure shear or shear combined with yielding of beam reinforcement occurred in all NSC joints and varied in shape and intensity depending on the column depth-to-beam longitudinal bar diameter (hc ⁄db) ratio and spacing of transverse beam/column reinforcement. Ductile failure characterized by the yielding of beam reinforcement and plastic hinge at the beam-joint interface occurred in all UHPC joints and was independent of the two aforementioned variables. The application of UHPC in the joint region resulted in increasing the joint ultimate strength by 27.6–54.8%, energy dissipation by 24–163%, and stiffness by 20 to 50%, compared to NSC joints. Such results were obtained when no transverse reinforcement is used in the joint, and only half transverse reinforcement is used in the beam/column members, and with hc ⁄db relaxed to 38% of the code recommended ratio, highlighting the advantages of UHPC joints. Predictions of ACI-ASCE 352R code were found to be overly unconservative and in need of future improvement.