Abstract

Plate anchors are commonly used to resist static, cyclic, and monotonic post-cyclic uplift loads. Under cyclic loading, progressive sudden failure may occur, characterized by accumulated displacement — even under loads significantly less than the static capacity. Despite extensive usage of geocell materials for increasing cyclic resilience, the influence of geocell reinforcements on cyclic uplift capacity is not well understood. In this study, a series of near-full-scale experimental tests, with and without geocell, are presented. Results show that the unreinforced system fails cyclically under a load that is almost 70% of its ultimate uplift capacity (Pu), but use of geocell enables stable cyclic resistance of over 100% Pu. For the given soil and configurations, a cyclic displacement rate that reaches less than 0.05 mm/cycle tends to highlight a likely stable response. Evaluation of the soil’s response to cyclic loading demonstrates that, with increasing loading cycles, the loading is increasingly transmitted through the soil close to the anchor in the unreinforced case, but that the reinforced case is less prone to this phenomenon. The monotonic post-cycling capacity of both reinforced and unreinforced anchors decreases after application of cyclic loading; however, the unreinforced scenario demonstrates larger decreases in capacity, particularly in the residual capacity.

Highlights

  • The stability of various structures may directly depend on anchoring that may resist static and cyclic uplift loadings

  • To investigate the uplift capacity and upward displacement of plate anchors supported by geocell layers, largescale testing on a square steel anchor plate with width of 300 mm and 2.54 mm thickness attached to an anchor rod with diameter of 50 mm was conducted in an indoor test pit

  • To define the sustained load ratio (SLR) and cyclic load ratio (CLR) to be used in the subsequent cyclic loading tests, the ultimate uplift capacity was determined in six monotonic uplift tests performed at three different embedment depth (D/B=1.5, 2.0 and 2.5) for unreinforced and geocell-reinforced conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The stability of various structures (e.g. masts, wind turbines, rock-fall protection fences, etc.) may directly depend on anchoring that may resist static and cyclic uplift loadings. Under cyclic uplift loading of anchoring systems, cumulative displacements may occur, resulting in the onset of failure over time (Andreadis and Harvey, 1981; Schiavon et al, 2017). The onset of progressive anchoring failure is often a function of the magnitude of static and cyclic loading, soil type, and anchoring system. The primary design requirement for many anchoring systems is to obtain sufficient resistance to static and cyclic load while keeping the cyclic displacement behavior compatible with structural mooring requirements. One viable means of mitigating progressive deformation of soil under cyclic loading is the application of geosynthetic reinforcement. Commonly used to inhibit cyclic deformation and “ratcheting” under compressive loading

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call