Abstract

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) arose as systems that merge computing systems with the human brain to facilitate recording, stimulation, and inhibition of neural activity. Over the years, the development of BCI technologies has shifted towards miniaturization of devices that can be seamlessly embedded into the brain and can target single neuron or small population sensing and control. We present a motivating example highlighting vulnerabilities of two promising micron-scale BCI technologies, demonstrating the lack of security and privacy principles in existing solutions. This situation opens the door to a novel family of cyberattacks, called neuronal cyberattacks, affecting neuronal signaling. This article defines the first two neural cyberattacks, Neuronal Flooding (FLO) and Neuronal Scanning (SCA), where each threat can affect the natural activity of neurons. This work implements these attacks in a neuronal simulator to determine their impact over the spontaneous neuronal behavior, defining three metrics: number of spikes, percentage of shifts, and dispersion of spikes. Several experiments demonstrate that both cyberattacks produce a reduction of spikes compared to spontaneous behavior, generating a rise in temporal shifts and a dispersion increase. Mainly, SCA presents a higher impact than FLO in the metrics focused on the number of spikes and dispersion, where FLO is slightly more damaging, considering the percentage of shifts. Nevertheless, the intrinsic behavior of each attack generates a differentiation on how they alter neuronal signaling. FLO is adequate to generate an immediate impact on the neuronal activity, whereas SCA presents higher effectiveness for damages to the neural signaling in the long-term.

Highlights

  • Brain-computer Interfaces (BCIs) are considered as bidirectional communication systems between the brain and external computational devices

  • BCIs arose as systems focused on controlling external devices such as prosthetic limbs [1], they have gone one step further, enabling artificial stimulation and inhibition of neuronal activity [2]

  • In our previous work [21], we studied the feasibility of performing cybersecurity attacks against the stages of the BCI cycle, considering different communication architectures, and highlighting their impact and possible countermeasures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brain-computer Interfaces (BCIs) are considered as bidirectional communication systems between the brain and external computational devices. BCIs arose as systems focused on controlling external devices such as prosthetic limbs [1], they have gone one step further, enabling artificial stimulation and inhibition of neuronal activity [2]. New BCI technologies are emerging, allowing a precise acquisition, stimulation, and inhibition of neuronal signaling. It reduces the brain damage caused by traditional invasive BCI systems and improves the limitations of non-invasive technologies such as attenuation, resolution, and distortion constraints [7], [8].

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call