Abstract

Three cutting methods, i.e. electrical discharge machining (EDM), band saw (BS) and water jet (WJ), were used to prepare cuboid samples of closed-cell aluminium Alporas foam. On the end surfaces of the prepared samples, local roughness of mesoscopic structural components (i.e. cell wall, node and facet) and global roughness for the entire cut surface were measured using confocal microscopy. Furthermore, quasi-static uniaxial compression tests were performed with intermittent unloading-reloading. In the initial stage of compression, the measured loading stiffness and unloading elastic modulus are highest, intermediate and lowest for the EDM-cut, BS-cut and WJ-cut samples, respectively. This difference in measured compressive properties has been correlated with the difference in end-surface roughness associated with different cutting methods. However, the peak and plateau of compressive stress and the unloading elastic modulus in the plateau stage are insensitive to cutting method. An analytical model has been developed to elucidate the observed compressive behaviour and shed light on the responsible mechanisms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.