Abstract

IntroductionDuring fracture osteosynthesis, traumatologists may remove screws which are too long, cut the excess length from the screw tip, then reinsert the cut screw (CS) to minimize implant waste. The purpose of this study was to determine if this practice influences screw purchase.MethodsUsing an axial-torsion load device, the maximal insertion torque (MIT) required to insert 3.5 mm stainless steel cortical screws into normal and osteoporotic bone models was measured. MIT was determined in three different test conditions: (1) long screw (LS) insertion; (2) LS insertion, removal, and insertion of a normal-length screw (NS); and, (3) LS insertion, removal, cutting excess length from the screw tip, and reinserting the CS.ResultsIn the normal bone model, mean (± SD) MIT of LS insertion was 546 ± 6 Newton-centimeters (N-cm) compared to 496 ± 61 N-cm for NS reinsertion and 465 ± 69 N-cm for CS reinsertion. In the osteoporotic bone model, MIT of LS insertion was 110 ± 11 N-cm, whereas the values for NS and CS reinsertions were 98 ± 9 N-cm and 101 ± 12 N-cm, respectively. There was no significant difference in MIT between CS and NS reinsertions in the osteoporotic bone analog.ConclusionsCutting excess length from a 3.5 mm stainless steel cortical screw did not decrease its purchase regardless of bone density. During osteosynthesis, orthopaedists may remove screws which are too long, cut the screw tip, and reinsert the shortened screw as a cost-saving measure without compromising fracture fixation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.