Abstract
Authorship attributions based upon the CUSUM (Cumulative Sum Analysis) method are still being presented in court proceedings as evidence despite the findings of several independent researchers that the method is unreliable. This paper describes the shortcomings of the method, presents further examples of its failures and summarises the findings of other researchers. The CUSUM method is seen to be discredited and should not be accepted as providing reliable evidence of authorship of either the written or the spoken word.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
