Abstract

Multi-fidelity optimization methods promise a high-fidelity optimum at a cost only slightly greater than a low-fidelity optimization. This promise is seldom achieved in practice, due to the requirement that low- and high-fidelity models correlate well. In this article, we propose an efficient bi-fidelity shape optimization method for turbulent fluid-flow applications with Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) as the high- and low-fidelity models within a hierarchical-Kriging surrogate modelling framework. Since the LES–RANS correlation is often poor, we use the full LES flow-field at a single point in the design space to derive a custom-tailored RANS closure model that reproduces the LES at that point. This is achieved with machine-learning techniques, specifically sparse regression to obtain high corrections of the turbulence anisotropy tensor and the production of turbulence kinetic energy as functions of the RANS mean-flow. The LES–RANS correlation is dramatically improved throughout the design-space. We demonstrate the effectivity and efficiency of our method in a proof-of-concept shape optimization of the well-known periodic-hill case. Standard RANS models perform poorly in this case, whereas our method converges to the LES-optimum with only two LES samples.

Highlights

  • Numerical fluid-dynamic shape-optimization is an increasingly central tool in engineering practice

  • A novel bi-fidelity fluid-dynamic shape optimization methodology is proposed, in which large-eddy simulation (LES) is used as the high-fidelity simulation tool and an automatically customized ReynoldsAveraged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence closure as the low-fidelity model

  • The full-field LES data obtained from the high-fidelity samples are used to train a RANS model for the flow being optimized

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Numerical fluid-dynamic shape-optimization is an increasingly central tool in engineering practice. In MFO, low-fidelity but cheapto-evaluate physics models are used to explore the design-space rapidly; their predictions are corrected by a few expensive high-fidelity simulations One such class of methods are the multi-fidelity surrogate modelling methods (Han and Görtz [13]), combined with a suitable sampling criteria (Jones et al [20]). Notable are gene-expression programming (GEP) (Weatheritt and Sandberg [36,37]), and deterministic sparse regression of turbulence anisotropy (SpaRTA) (Schmelzer et al [33]) These methods generate models that can be rapidly implemented in existing CFD codes and evaluated at every iteration of a RANS solution, and potentially inspected to identify the physical mechanisms influencing the flow.

Baseline incompressible LES and RANS simulations
Baseline Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes with k-ω SST
Large-eddy simulation for the periodic-hills
Enhancing RANS with data-driven turbulence modelling
Identifying model-form error with the k-corrective-frozen-RANS approach
Deterministic symbolic regression for corrective field modelling
Bi-fidelity optimization loop with custom RANS as low-fidelity
Variable-fidelity surrogate modelling: hierarchical Kriging
Periodic hill optimization: cost function and design-space exploration
Optimization convergence
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call