Custom GPTs Enhancing Performance and Evidence Compared with GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and GPT-4o? A Study on the Emergency Medicine Specialist Examination.

Abstract

Given the widespread application of ChatGPT, we aim to evaluate its proficiency in the emergency medicine specialty written examination. Additionally, we compare the performance of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPTs, and GPT-4o. The research seeks to ascertain whether custom GPTs possess the essential capabilities and access to knowledge bases necessary for providing accurate information, and to explore the effectiveness and potential of personalized knowledge bases in supporting the education of medical residents. We evaluated the performance of ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, custom GPTs, and GPT-4o on the Emergency Medicine Specialist Examination in Taiwan. Two hundred single-choice exam questions were provided to these AI models, and their responses were recorded. Correct rates were compared among the four models, and the McNemar test was applied to paired model data to determine if there were significant changes in performance. Out of 200 questions, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, custom GPTs, and GPT-4o correctly answered 77, 105, 119, and 138 questions, respectively. GPT-4o demonstrated the highest performance, significantly better than GPT-4, which, in turn, outperformed GPT-3.5, while custom GPTs exhibited superior performance compared to GPT-4 but inferior performance compared to GPT-4o, with all p < 0.05. In the emergency medicine specialty written exam, our findings highlight the value and potential of large language models (LLMs), and highlight their strengths and limitations, especially in question types and image-inclusion capabilities. Not only do GPT-4o and custom GPTs facilitate exam preparation, but they also elevate the evidence level in responses and source accuracy, demonstrating significant potential to transform educational frameworks and clinical practices in medicine.