Abstract

Few reports have been published about the deliberations on classroom curriculum conducted by teachers. This qualitative case‐study explored the curriculum deliberations of three fourth‐grade teachers who met weekly to plan social studies and science lessons. The teachers participated voluntarily and routinely produced viable plans for the coming week. The planning meetings were audiotape recorded and transcribed. The resulting transcripts were analysed using Walker's System for Analysing Curriculum Deliberations (SACD). The teachers had deliberated routinely about their lessons for four years. This veteran group experienced few conflicts and invested most of their planning energy in SACD episodes identified as ‘brainstorms’. Group members valued the social aspects of their meetings as well as the curriculum plans produced. This case‐study demonstrates the power of teachers who work together to craft the curriculum they implement. This type of team planning requires a structure that allows teachers the freedom to make their own decisions. This requirement for freedom alerts school administrators and curriculum writers on the importance of allowing teachers truly to be the ‘ultimate arbiters of classroom practice’.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.