Abstract
Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) is the standard of care for the local excision of large rectal adenomas and selected rectal cancers: an “en bloc” full-thickness local excision is performed, with limited risk of specimen fragmentation and positive resection margins, and subsequent significantly lower risk of recurrence and better survival than after conventional transanal excision with retractors. We perform a literature review aiming at assessing the current trends on the status of TES. Patients undergoing TES report significantly lower rates of postoperative complications and better functional outcomes than patients who receive abdominal rectal resection with total mesorectal excision, with no adverse impact on long-term survival. To date, there are two different rigid platforms that are available to perform a TES procedure: the transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) platform that was conceived by Buess in the early 1980s and the TEO (transanal endoscopic operation) platform. More recently, flexible platforms have been proposed as alternative to the rigid ones. Based on the current evidence, TEM and TEO represent the current standard of treatment for large rectal adenomas and selected rectal cancers. Large comparative studies are needed to assess the benefits of flexible platforms, considering that the wide adoption of flexible platforms might impair the quality of the local excision, mainly if performed in low-volume centers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.