Abstract
BackgroundSimulation based training enables pediatric surgical trainees to attain proficiency in surgical skills. This study aims to identify the currently available simulators for pediatric surgery, assess their validation and strength of evidence supporting each model. MethodsBoth Medline and EMBASE were searched for English language articles either describing or validating simulation models for pediatric surgery. A level of evidence (LoE) followed by a level of recommendation (LoR) was assigned to each validation study and simulator, based on a modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine classification for educational studies. ResultsForty-nine articles were identified describing 44 training models and courses. Of these articles, 44 were validation studies. Face validity was evaluated by 20 studies, 28 for content, 24 demonstrated construct validity and 1 showed predictive validity. Of the validated models, 3 were given an LoR of 2, 21 an LoR of 3 and 12 an LoR of 4. None reached the highest LoR. ConclusionsThere are a growing number of simulators specific to pediatric surgery. However, these simulators have limited LoE and LoR in current studies. The lack of NoTSS training is also apparent. We advocate more randomized trials to validate these models, and attempts to determine predictive validity. Type of studyOriginal / systematic review. Level of evidence1.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
