Abstract

In this article, the current state of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) was reviewed, focusing on lymph node dissection and reconstruction. Lymph node dissection in LTG is technically similar to that in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer; however, LTG for advanced gastric cancer requires extended lymph node dissections including splenic hilar lymph nodes. Although a recent randomized controlled trial clearly indicated no survival benefit in prophylactic splenectomy for lymph node dissection at the splenic hilum, some patients may receive prognostic benefit from adequate splenic hilar lymph node dissection. Considering reconstruction, there are two major esophagojejunostomy (EJS) techniques, using a circular stapler (CS) or using a linear stapler (LS). A few studies have shown that the LS method has fewer complications; however, almost all studies have reported that morbidity (such as anastomotic leakage and stricture) is not significantly different for the two methods. As for CS, we grouped various studies addressing complications in LTG into categories according to the insertion procedure of the anvil and the insertion site in the abdominal wall for the CS. We compared the rate of complications, particularly for leakage and stricture. The rate of anastomotic leakage and stricture was the lowest when inserting the CS from the upper left abdomen and was significantly the highest when inserting the CS from the midline umbilical. Scrupulous attention to EJS techniques is required by surgeons with a clear understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each anastomotic device and approach.

Highlights

  • Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer death in the world.[1]

  • Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is not common compared with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), which is carried out in only 25% (1556/6183) of total gastrectomy procedures, according to a questionnaire‐based survey conducted by the Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery in 2015, the proportion of LDG had increased to 54% (6884/ 12 722).[21]

  • We reviewed several recent reports on lymphadenectomy and reconstruction in laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer death in the world.[1]. We reported that patients with tumors localized on the greater curvature and type 4 cancer might obtain relatively high survival benefits from splenic hilar lymph node dissection.[40]. By several techniques described above, most articles have indicated that a laparoscopic approach could obtain similar short‐term results concerning the number of retrieved splenic hilar lymph nodes and occurrence rates of postoperative complications. Inokuchi et al[50] reviewed anastomotic complications in 46 case studies of LTG to compare various procedures for EJS They classified anastomosis into six categories: (i) extracorporeal reconstruction by a single‐stapling technique using a CS; (ii) intracorporeal reconstruction by a single‐stapling technique using a CS; (iii) intracorporeal reconstruction by a double (or hemi‐double) stapling technique using a CS with a transabdominally inserted anvil; (d) intracorporeal reconstruction by a double (or hemi‐double) stapling technique using a CS with a transorally inserted anvil (Orvil, Medtronic plc, Dublin, Ireland); (e) intracorporeal reconstruction by side‐to‐side anastomosis using an LS; and (f) intracorporeal reconstruction by functional end‐to‐end.

Method
Findings
| CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call