Abstract
We retrospectively evaluated the effect of follow-up for chronic liver disease in 91 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Of these patients, 38 (41.8%) were followed-up for chronic liver disease, while 53 patients (58.2%) were not followed-up. Regarding the baseline status of the liver, the proportion of patients with non-viral hepatitis was significantly higher among patients who were not followed-up (p<0.001). Furthermore, the cumulative survival rate was significantly lower among patients who were not followed-up (p=0.013). Among the 53 patients who were not followed-up, 20 (37.7%) patients did not undergo abdominal imaging for hepatic evaluation despite recorded hepatic issues, and 31 patients (58.5%) were treated by a primary care doctor. Our study suggests that the identification of patients with non-viral hepatitis and confirmation that they are followed-up are vital for improving the prognosis of patients with chronic liver disease.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have